|
Post by Fool Coyote on May 12, 2008 7:10:51 GMT -5
Here's what pisses me off about Internet sources! When I write an article, I like to use sources to make sure that what I'm presenting to people is as accurate as possible. In my quest for the Flidias article I'm working on, I have pin pointed her associations with deer as a part of her "cattle" but every where I go I see all this talk about a "deer drawn chariot". Flidias is mentioned in a number of sources, yet I have yet to find anything - at all having to do with a deer drawn chariot. The only texts I have yet to go through are medieval texts, but this is what bugs me. Why say it if you have no sources to back it up? All I find is "[citation needed]" *if* it gives you anything at all... LoL, It's gotta either be in the medieval texts, or the oral lore of county Mayo. LoL, this article is becoming quite a challenge. I'll get it. Think I'll run it by the group and see if they can save me a lil time.
|
|